Pages

Jump to bottom

6 comments

1 calochortus  Thu, Nov 1, 2012 6:53:16pm

Hmmm, what if we decided to really work on this problem from 2 different directions?
We could put a lot of people to work on improving infrastructure, and we could work to minimize climate change.
Of course, that would require that we work through (gasp!) government, but wouldn't that be better than blowing the money on annoying people with military adventures abroad?

2 prairiefire  Thu, Nov 1, 2012 7:25:12pm

Governor Cuomo stated tonight that the long term planning for NY infrastructure has got to change. It would be foolish and regressive not to, imo.
And Lord knows, there's enough money invested in all that real estate currently underwater, they will figure out a way to do it.

{{lawhawk}}

3 lawhawk  Thu, Nov 1, 2012 7:41:09pm

re: #2 prairiefire

I really doubt the infrastructure will change. And it's more than infrastructure.

It's about zoning and building on barrier islands. It's about doing more to make the power distribution system more durable - whether it's burying lines in areas that aren't flood-prone to making sure that they're above ground in those that are flood prone. No one method will be a cure-all. Redundancy needs to be addressed.

It's about adjusting infrastructure to recognize new technologies and storm protection systems.

But the costs aren't going to come cheap - and everyone will balk at the cost to install protection systems like the tidal barriers that some have suggested.

Thing is - the storm protection system might protect Manhattan, but it wouldn't help someplace like Long Beach or Long Branch.

4 prairiefire  Thu, Nov 1, 2012 8:56:39pm

re: #3 lawhawk

Can you imagine 3/8th's of Manhattan being sliced off like a piece of cake? I don't see how they can maintain the level of protection needed if the storm water levels return again continually over the next 5 to 10 years.

5 Tigger2  Fri, Nov 2, 2012 2:19:45am

re: #4 prairiefire

Can you imagine 3/8th's of Manhattan being sliced off like a piece of cake? I don't see how they can maintain the level of protection needed if the storm water levels return again continually over the next 5 to 10 years.

The water levels will get even higher in time. They better start building for that and not for just what happened.

6 wheat-dogghazi  Fri, Nov 2, 2012 6:17:22am

re: #5 Tigger2

The water levels will get even higher in time. They better start building for that and not for just what happened.

They can take lessons from Amsterdam and other cities in the Low Countries.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Ranked-Choice Voting Has Challenged the Status Quo. Its Popularity Will Be Tested in November. JUNEAU — Alaska’s new election system — with open primaries and ranked voting — has been a model for those in other states who are frustrated by political polarization and a sense that voters lack real choice at the ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 99 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0